Hi. I'm Chloé, and I'm an ordinary citizen.

I started working when I was 11. Since then I've worked in ten different industries and moved about 24 times. Along the way I've come to know and love people from every background, every income level and every kind of life.

That's why I built this. It's meant to protect everyone from a small number of people who have spent billions trying to decide for the rest of us: who gets to vote, how the votes are counted, and what our daily lives look like. Some of them have said openly that democracy should be replaced: by a single "national CEO," which one of their leading thinkers admits "is what's called a dictator," and by private cities run by companies instead of voters.

Our system was built so that all of us can choose people from our own communities, people we know and trust, to represent us. That's what this project is here to protect.

This comes from a neighbor, not an organization. I have people I love in every one of these spaces, and I don't want any of them living in the world that's coming. I want all of us to be free, with the same real chances in life: not handouts, but a hand up.

If you take the time to read one thing in full this year, please let it be this. For your family, for your future, and for the relief of finally knowing what's going on.

Don't take my word for it. Read what they've said themselves ↓

Follow the Lines · independent research · every line sourced

They've said what they want. Here's how they're building it.

For months I've mapped the people funding, staffing and defending today's push to concentrate power in very few hands. The same names keep appearing across courts, elections, media, surveillance, defense and money. Every connection is graded by how strong the evidence is.

How this started

2009: the year ordinary people got a megaphone

In short: right after ordinary people used the internet to inform each other, organize and elect a president, the network on this map started taking shape.

Before the internet, most people only knew what a handful of TV networks and newspapers reported. Then that changed. In 2008 a presidential campaign raised about half a billion dollars online, mostly in small donations, and organized millions of volunteers through social media. For the first time, regular people could check facts, find each other and organize at scale without anyone's permission.

Here is what happened next, on the record:

My read (analysis): the people with the most to lose from an informed, organized public couldn't shut the internet down, and they needed it to win the global technology race. So they set out to win the races, the courts and the platforms instead, and to flood the new public square with noise. Tech billionaires, legal activists and party operatives didn't always work together, but they shared one interest: keeping power, money and influence in their own hands. That shared interest is the plan this map traces: ending democracy's threat to their wealth and power. By democracy, I mean all of us.

Where Donald Trump fits (my read): he isn't the architect. He's the vehicle: a candidate who could win the votes the plan needed, and who has been willing to go along with it.

Thankfully, the plan shows cracks. Those cracks are what led me to this research, and to this map.

Sources: Cato Unbound · Citizens United v. FEC · Robert Draper, "Do Not Ask What Good We Do" (2012) · Washington Post, Nov 2008 (online fundraising)

In their own words

Here's what they've said, on the record

In short: several people at the center of this network have said, on the record, that they want voters out of the decisions that matter.

Each quote includes where and when it was said. Tap a name to see that person's lines on the map.

Why I'm doing this

The pieces are reported one at a time. They aren't happening one at a time.

In short: the same names keep turning up across courts, elections, media, surveillance and money. Seen together, the pieces add up.

Most people meet these stories separately: a court ruling, a media sale, a surveillance contract, a donor retreat. Each looks like its own story. Put the names side by side and the same people keep appearing, funding one piece, staffing another, defending a third.

Several of the people at the center have described, on the record, the country they want, and in the most explicit versions voters decide nothing at all: power goes to a "national CEO" and to privately run cities. Taken one at a time, those statements are easy to wave off. Mapped against the money and the moves, they are much harder to dismiss.

This project has one job. It puts the connected picture in front of people who can still act on it, including reporters, state officials, congressional staff and voters, before the November 3 election. After that, it gives a new House majority a ready-made roadmap for investigation.

This isn't about left versus right. It's about whether decisions over your rights, your money, your ability to own things and build something for your family, your safety, your property, and your ability to choose people from your own community to represent you (and to vote them out) stay with you. Power that answers to voters keeps courts fair, markets predictable and neighborhoods livable, at every income level.

I know these things have felt beyond reach for a long, long time. That's what this map tracks, and it will give you clarity. The resources were always there; they've just been hoarded by a few.

How this was researched. Months of work: thousands of pages of articles, notes, court records, public statements and official filings, and hundreds of hours of documentaries and video. Every fact was checked against other sources before it went on the map. I questioned myself constantly and stayed open to being wrong.

For people who are doing well

If you're comfortable, this still isn't being built for you

In short: money doesn't buy you a vote in a system run by an owner or a "national CEO." The cameras, the market shocks and the attacks on institutions reach comfortable neighborhoods too.

A great deal of money goes into persuading comfortable people that this movement protects them. The actual, verified record points the exact opposite way.

Wealth isn't a seat at the table.

The governing models this network promotes hand decisions to a founder, an owner or a "national CEO," not to voters and not to ordinary shareholders. Próspera, a private city in Honduras backed by a Thiel-funded fund, is run by a company and is suing the Honduran government for about $10.7 billion after the country moved to end its charter.

Sources: Próspera

The cameras point at your street too.

Flock Safety sells license-plate cameras to homeowners associations as well as police, and federal immigration officials have searched Flock data through local departments. Larry Ellison has said that under constant AI recording, "citizens will be on their best behavior."

Sources: Flock Safety: HOAs · Inman · Bend Source

Markets run on rules that are being removed.

The April 2025 tariff announcement erased trillions of dollars in stock value within two days. The President then tried to fire a sitting Federal Reserve governor; the Supreme Court stopped it in June 2026.

Sources: 2025 stock market crash · SCOTUSblog

The institutions you rely on are targets.

Executive orders went after major law firms by name; a federal judge struck one down as unconstitutional. A 2025 national security directive, NSPM-7, tells agencies to investigate networks and funders tied to "anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-Christianity."

Sources: NPR · NSPM-7

The exits are built for a very few.

New Zealand citizenship and lakefront land (Thiel). About 98% of the island of Lanai (Ellison). Estates on Miami's guarded "Billionaire Bunker" island (Bezos). A new private city on 55,000 acres of California farmland (backers include Andreessen and Reid Hoffman). A hardened military complex beneath the White House that Congress never authorized.

Sources: RNZ · Robb Report · SF Chronicle via Yahoo · TIME

How the plan works

No single move does this. Every front moves at once.

In short: the plan (to keep power, money and influence in a few hands; see how it started) works because it moves on every front at once, and each front protects the others.

The map sorts every company, group, event and idea by the domain of power it touches. Tap a card to see that part of the map.

I encourage you to read these cards, because they'll help you understand the map. I also know our attention spans are squat-diddly right now. So if you'd rather, check out the map first and come back to the cards. Whatever gets you to really dig in. The map's pretty cool.

★ The money behind the message

Shaping what people see and believe is one of the most expensive parts of this plan. A few documented numbers:

  • $44 billion: Elon Musk's 2022 purchase of Twitter, now X.
  • About $8 billion: the Ellison-financed Skydance takeover of Paramount, owner of CBS News (2025).
  • About $215 million: ads about transgender people run by Trump and his allies in the 2024 campaign. (Transgender people are about 0.6% of Americans 13 and older, per UCLA's Williams Institute.)
  • $787.5 million: what Fox paid Dominion in 2023 to settle over false 2020-election claims aired on Fox.
  • About $10 million: secret funding from Russian state media (RT) to Tenet Media, which paid U.S. right-wing influencers (Justice Department, Sept 2024).
  • About $15 million: Robert Mercer's investment in Cambridge Analytica. The firm took data on up to 87 million Facebook users without their consent and used it to build personality profiles for targeting political ads; it worked for Trump's 2016 campaign. Facebook later paid a $5 billion federal penalty over privacy failures including this one.

Sources: The Drum · CBS News · CNN · Al Jazeera

Why this strategy works

The strategy: permanently end democracy's threat (and by democracy I mean all of us) to a handful of people's power, money and influence.

"Then why aren't my representatives stopping this?"

They're being overwhelmed on purpose. Steve Bannon, who ran Trump's 2016 campaign and was his White House chief strategist, described the method in 2018: "The real opposition is the media. And the way to deal with them is to flood the zone with shit."

My read (analysis): the flood isn't only aimed at you and me. It hits police, the military, elected officials and even foreign allies, all at once, so the systems that protect us can be taken apart in the background until we can't vote them out.

If you've been confused, scared or hopeless, this is for you. I know it seems backwards, but I feel calmer now. It's scary, yes. But you have to know what's going on in order to solve it, and we can actually solve this, including by getting these people away from positions of power. They talk about the rest of us like vermin. We're not. And people are working on this, including me.

Next in line

The two people next in line for the presidency are both part of this network

In short: if the presidency opens up for any reason, JD Vance takes over the same day, with no new election. If both offices are empty, Speaker Mike Johnson is next. Both are tied into this network, and both have already acted on its agenda.

The order is set by the 25th Amendment (vice president first) and the Presidential Succession Act of 1947 (then the Speaker of the House).

Those counts are only what I could document. These people work to keep their networks and plans hidden, so the real numbers are likely higher. Seven domains is plenty.

This isn't only going to voters. It's going to the people we elected, who can act on it. I know each of them is only one person, and I'm doing everything I can to get this in front of everyone who matters. That includes you.

The map

Names on the left. What they share on the right.

Brown lines are established and blue are circumstantial. Dashed purple lines are hypotheses, and red marks what's active right now. The arcs along the left edge connect people directly to each other. Tap any name, item or line to see the fact and source behind every connection. What the colors and marks mean ↓

Tip: hit Clear anytime to get back to the full map. It's massive, so if anything ever looks sparse (on phones it opens on the highest-stakes items), hit Clear and there she blows.

Show
Evidence Purpose
Reference

How to read this map

Line colors

Brown: established
A reliable record documents the connection directly: official filings, court records, the person's own words, or multiple major news reports.
Blue: circumstantial
Substantial evidence points to this connection (the same meetings, the same money, the same deals), but no public document confirms it directly. Confirming it would take records that aren't public, the kind a court or congressional subpoena can compel.
Purple, dashed: hypothesis
A possibility the facts heavily suggest but don't yet establish, shown with the facts on each side. Treat it as a question, not a claim.
Red: urgent
Active right now, mostly in the November 3, 2026 election. Red marks timing, not strength of evidence; the fact beside each red line says what is documented.
Not shown
Green lines (need more research to confirm) and yellow lines (noise: real but minor, or likely a distraction) stay in the working file for now, because they still need checking. They're available to anyone on request: see the contact at the bottom of this page.

Marks and labels

◠ Arcs on the left edge
Direct ties between two people, such as a funder and the candidate they backed, a boss and an employee, or co-founders. Same colors as the other lines. Tap an arc to see the fact behind it. On phones, turn them on with the "Person-to-person arcs" button.
★ Highest stakes
Items with large-scale, lasting effects on rights, elections, public money (your tax dollars) or lives.
V-1 to V-10
The domain of power an item touches:
◆ Take · ▼ Hold down · ▲ Build
My analysis of what an item accomplishes: taking the levers of power, keeping people from organizing, or building the world a few people want for themselves. Treat these marks like purple lines: reasoned, not established.
(opposed) / (conflict)
A public fight, split or lawsuit. It is still a connection, not an exit. Public fights inside a network can serve its larger goals; for example, someone can criticize Trump while backing Vance. Read these lines as part of the picture.
(must manually confirm)
A detail still being checked against a second source.
Source link being added
The fact comes from the research record; the direct link isn't attached yet.
Role in the network
A short characterization of each person's part in the picture. The "who they are" line under it is factual.
Not able to be determined by existing search
I looked, and public records don't answer it yet. That doesn't mean it won't come out, for example through lawsuits or subpoenas.

Terms

Super PAC
A political committee that can raise and spend unlimited money, as long as it doesn't coordinate directly with a candidate. Made possible by Citizens United (2010).
Dark money
Political spending by groups that don't have to name their donors, usually 501(c)(4) nonprofits.
Schedule F
A job category that lets a president fire career civil servants at will. Restored by executive order in January 2025.
Preemption
When a federal rule overrides state laws on the same subject, such as state AI rules.
Mid-decade redistricting
Redrawing congressional maps between censuses to change which party wins seats.
Alien Enemies Act
A 1798 wartime law that allows detaining and removing citizens of an enemy nation without the usual hearings.
Impoundment
A president refusing to spend money Congress has approved. The 1974 Impoundment Control Act restricts it.
Line of succession
Who becomes president if the office is vacant: the vice president, then the Speaker of the House, then the Senate's president pro tempore.
Discharge petition
A way for a majority of the House (218 signatures) to force a vote the Speaker won't schedule.
Amicus brief
A filing by someone outside a case urging the court to rule a certain way.
Sovereign wealth fund
A government-owned investment fund, such as Saudi Arabia's PIF or Qatar's QIA.
NRx (neoreaction)
A movement associated with Curtis Yarvin arguing that democracy has failed and should give way to rule by a single executive.
Network state, charter city
New communities governed by a private charter or online membership instead of an existing government.
Accelerationism, e/acc
The view that technology and markets should be sped up, not restrained.
Polygenic embryo screening
Ranking IVF embryos by predicted disease risk or traits using many genetic markers at once.
Stablecoin
A cryptocurrency pegged to a regular currency such as the dollar.
If you ever want them out

What this surveillance system could do to anyone who organizes against it

In short: the tools to track where you drive, what you earn, where you get care and who you organize with are being joined together, and a 2025 directive already names the kinds of groups to investigate.

Why the walls were there. For fifty years, U.S. law kept your records apart on purpose. After Watergate, Congress passed the Privacy Act of 1974 to limit how federal agencies share files about you, and in 1976 it made tax returns confidential after President Nixon's White House tried to use the IRS against its enemies. Separate systems meant no one official could see your whole life at once. Those are the walls now coming down.

Picture it plainly. A few years from now, enough people decide they want this network out of power and start organizing to vote it out. Here is what is already built or ordered:

Analysis: none of these tools is limited to immigrants or "extremists." Once tax, health, travel and association records sit in one searchable system, the only safeguard is who controls it, and whoever controls it decides who counts as a threat. A movement to vote them out could be mapped, from its organizers to its donors to where it meets. That is why this has to be settled while voting still decides who holds power.

Sources: Bend Source · EFF · American Immigration Council · KFF · NPR · NSPM-7 · Defense One · Nextgov · Bloomberg · Fortune

Less to stand on

What's being squeezed: homes, health care and savings

In short: people without stable housing, health coverage or savings can't easily take time off, organize or push back. Those are exactly the things being squeezed.

My read (analysis): a public with no cushion has no time, money or energy left to organize. The same network that profits from the squeeze is the one asking to be trusted with power. And what's happened so far is only what they think they can get away with while still winning your vote through the media smoke screen. It gets worse once they no longer have to worry about being voted out.

In case you're wondering if I'm a "handout" person: that conversation is more complicated, and it absolutely has to be had. But our whole society is better when we give people a hand up. This network is giving all of us a smackdown, one way or another.

Sources: Private Equity Stakeholder Project · The Conversation · Yahoo Finance · CBO · STAT · NPR · CNBC · PE Hub

But what about…

If you have concerns, look at what this network actually does about them

In short: whatever issue worries you most, check the record. The pattern is more heat and fewer fixes.

I'll be blunt. You may have real concerns about drugs, the border, crime, or gender and what kids are taught. I can tell you without a sliver of hesitation that the network in charge is not solving any of them. It keeps them burning. Don't take my word for it:

"I want everyone on their best behavior."

The rules stop at the top.

Trump pardoned about 1,500 Jan. 6 defendants (Jan 2025) and 77 people tied to the fake-elector effort (Nov 2025). In Oct 2025 Trump pardoned Binance founder Changpeng Zhao, who had pleaded guilty to anti-money-laundering violations, after Abu Dhabi's MGX paid for a $2 billion stake in Binance using USD1, the Trump family's stablecoin.

Sources: CNN · CBS News · PBS NewsHour · FactCheck.org · CNBC

In plain words: people at the top get pardoned. The cameras and databases are for the rest of us.

"I'm worried about drugs."

A convicted cocaine trafficker went free.

In Dec 2025, Trump pardoned former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernández, convicted in a U.S. court in 2024 of conspiring to import cocaine into the United States. Meanwhile the federal addiction agency was cut, and the 2025 budget law cuts Medicaid, the largest payer for addiction treatment.

Sources: Congressional Research Service · Washington Post · STAT · NPR · Bloomberg · Fox News · FactCheck.org

In plain words: a man convicted of helping smuggle cocaine into the U.S. was set free, while help for people fighting addiction was cut.

"I'm worried about the border."

A bipartisan border bill was killed before it could pass.

In Feb 2024 a Senate deal with stricter asylum rules, more border agents and money for fentanyl detection collapsed after Trump urged Republicans to oppose it. Speaker Mike Johnson called it "dead on arrival" in the House.

Sources: PBS NewsHour · Axios · The Hill · NPR · Texas Tribune

In plain words: a border deal both parties negotiated was killed in an election year, after Trump told Republicans to oppose it.

"I'm worried about gender and what kids are taught."

It was worth $215 million in ads.

Trump and his allies spent about $215 million on ads about transgender people in the 2024 campaign. That is money spent on turning an issue into a fight, not on a plan for anyone's kids.

Sources: The Drum · CBS News · ABC News · Newsweek

In plain words: they spent $215 million on ads about a group that's less than 1% of people 13 and older.

They'll stoke the fire until we're all burnt out, without solving a thing. It's time to get the instigators out so we can finally focus on solving our problems.

Want to watch instead? See the film list ↓

What happens next

The next four months

Here's what I'm doing next, along with any citizens who have time to help spread this:

Now → Nov 3

Get the documented facts to reporters, state officials and congressional oversight staff who can act on them.

Nov 3 → Jan 3

Track certification and seating in the closest races, where results are most likely to be contested.

From Jan 2027

Hand the full map to a new House majority as a ready-made investigation roadmap: who to subpoena, and for what.

Watch and go deeper

If you'd rather watch than read

In short: these films and videos cover pieces of this map from the inside. Each is labeled with who made it, so you can weigh it.

How it started

The people behind it

Power, courts and money

Data, persuasion and surveillance

Homes, and where "human selection" comes from

For everyone in the States

This is my part. Here's yours.

I don't want to leave you scared and not knowing what to do. Here are some resources I've come across along the way, many of them run by members of our communities who care about the people around them, often without being paid to do it. People like you and me.

Do your own research. Find candidates who represent you: your hopes, your hopes for your kids, your values, your empathy, and your desire to see the world around you grow and change for the better. And the best part: if they don't turn out to be who you thought, you can vote them out, just like it should be.

And go to your county clerk's elections office too. They answer questions, and they always need volunteers.

We can fix this, but only if we do it together. We need community-driven decisions, led with dignity, not hurt, despair, chaos and apathy.

Support

Keep this going through January

This is independent work. I quit my job to do it. I'd been researching on my own time, trying to understand why so much of what was coming out of the government made no sense, and why my feeds were filling with fake posts and bots. The more I dug, the more ties and connections I found. So I gave myself a few months to figure out what it was, and whether I could help. I had no idea it would turn into this.

I've spent my savings getting this far, and I'm asking individual people, not organizations, to fund the next four months.

What your support pays for
  • Full-time work on the map and outreach through January
  • Printed briefs and signs, and travel to meet officials and reporters in person
  • Public-records requests and document costs
The rules I hold myself to
  • Individuals only. No corporate, PAC or large political-donor money.
  • Up to $500 per person.
  • A plain monthly accounting of where every dollar goes.

Sharing this page with one person who'd want to know helps as much as money.

Want the full working file?

The full working map, including leads still being confirmed and the source behind every connection, is available on request, with a two-page summary. Reporters, researchers, officials and neighbors are all welcome.